I have a fresh install on rockylinux with rpm version 2.0.31. I have problems when using the dropdown menus, they don’t work. I have activated the option to add a button in the “all apps” menu and from there I can access the terminal tools and others without problem.
Thanks for the information. I want to make sure that I’m following where you are seeing the problem. When you say “Dropdown menus”, are you talking about the ones in the Navbar at the top of the site? Also, when you say you have “activated the option to add a button in the ‘all app’ menu”, are you saying that you have create a sub-menu under the ‘all apps’ menu in the navbar, and that sub-menu is working properly?
I have continued doing tests and I have realized that with the Edge browser (in Windows) it works perfectly (althought i get error saving changes when i make changes in files), but in other browsers both in Linux and Windows it fails (Chrome, Chromium, firefox). I write below tested versions browser.
Version 78.0.3904.97 (Official Build) Fedora Project (64-bit) → works navbar but fails list and edit files in Files apps.
Version 111.0.5563.66 (Official Build) (64-bit) Chrome → fails
Version 111.0.1661.44 (Official build) (64-bit) Edge → works
Version 111.0.5563.64 (Official Build) (64-bit) Chrome → Fails
Firefox version 111.0 (64-bit) → Fails
Chromium Version 111.0.5563.64 (Official Build) snap (64-bit) → Fails
Chrome Version 110.0.5481.177 (Official Build) (64-bit) → Fails
Seems to be a bug on our side. I can replicate on Ubuntu/Firefox when I use the Spanish ES localization. It would appear that Windows/Edge has better handling of this localization or you use something different for that platform.
I see other spanish localizations - AR, CL & MX - I assume you’re using use ES?
I haven’t tested the others, and I use English US daily with no issue.
Luckily the next version (3.0) doesn’t seem to have this issue - at least with Spanish (ES).
We’re just about to release that next version, but I’m also trying to get a few things backported to 2.0 at this time too. I’ll take a quick look into how difficult it may be to fix this issue. Depending on the feasibility, we may backport it to 2.0. I’ll let you know here on this topic.
We will wait for the good news with version 3. We are a research organisation in Spain and would like to implement the ondemand service in our infrastructure. If we can help in any way we would try, even testing version 3 rc.